BANK OF AMERICA dismissed its frivolous lawsuit against me but not before incriminating itself and others in the crooked Establishment including but not limited to: judges, law firms, religious leaders and organizations, nonprofit schools and other nonprofits, the court-appointed therapist, First Lady Michelle Obama, my husband and his mistress a.k.a. “the high priced call girl” from the Dr. Phil show.
BANK OF AMERICA sent me a letter wanting to be “held harmless” for aiding and abetting in hiding and stealing assets totaling MILLIONS OF DOLLARS from my community estate which should have been FULLY DISCLOSED on the divorce contract and then distributed to me at the time of divorce or thereafter.
BANK OF AMERICA claimed that I owed them money due to my credit card when they did not disclose all the assets amounting to MILLONS OF DOLLARS they aided and abetted those listed above in hiding and stealing from me and CONTINUING to hide and steal from me.
Like many are saying about HILLARY’s staff; why did BANK OF AMERICA request to have immunity or be “held harmless” if it did not do anything illegal?
Do you think BANK OF AMERICA is not aware of the law mandating that at the time of divorce all the marital assets and other assets TOO which either spouse has or may have any interest in must be fully and accurately disclosed?
Regardless, Ignorance of the Law is not an excuse, especially for a sophisticated, experienced bank like BANK OF AMERICA.
To repeatedly violate the law shows INTENT and MALICE whereby BANK OF AMERICA (and the others mentioned above) can also be charged with PUNITIVE DAMAGES amounting to millions of dollars.
Think the CLAWBACK RULES can be applied to the Executives of Bank of America too. We shall see because BANK OF AMERICA is a defendant in my Federal lawsuit along with some of the others mentioned above.
Any reasonable and objective person knows that to aid and abet in hiding and stealing assets at the time of divorce and thereafter so that the Wife/Mother is deprived of her legal rights whereby she becomes financially and emotionally devastated is not only illegal but is also immoral, unconscionable and very, very malicious.
Shouldn’t BANK OF AMERICA and THE OTHERS LISTED ABOVE be held responsible or should they be “held harmless” so that they can CONTINUE to violate the law causing others to become financially and emotionally devastated while they profit?
This is not democracy which mandates EQUAL RIGHTS.
Anyway, I am thrilled as more facts are being exposed and as expected, those who are corrupt and immoral keep incriminating themselves AND EACH OTHER more and more.
Keep giving them more and more rope and watch them hang themselves.
As always none of this is legal or any other advice; it is based upon my knowledge and experiences including facts about those in the Establishment.
-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder; www.PAlienation.org