Do you think if Judge Claudia Silbar was blind like Justice Richard Bernstein she would have reviewed, signed and then filed the stipulated and then granted post judgment spousal support modifications reducing the ex-wife’s spousal support based on the INVALID stipulated judgment she reviewed, signed and filed and also based on implausible stories and implausible sworn testimony of the ex-husband who is a certified public account, chief financial officer who received his MBA from Harvard?
Richard Bernstein who is blind, has just been elected as a Justice to Michigan’s Supreme Court. He has made many amazing accomplishments.
Being blind and having a SPECIAL PERSPECTIVE has helped Justice Richard Bernstein have an honest and fulfilling life developing skills to help himself and others.
In January, he will take his coveted position on Michigan’s Supreme Court and UNLIKE OTHER JUSTICES; he has been preparing for months.
His clerks have been helping him prepare for the cases he will be hearing by reading to him documents in each case file. (I used to summarize the case files in WRITING for the honest and wise Judge I clerked for and highlight important points of interest and legal precedent).
Justice Bernstein’s clerks are READING all this information to him and he is memorizing this abundance of information taking great pride and using amazing diligence.
Do you think if Judge Claudia Silbar was blind like Justice Richard Bernstein, she would have deprived the ex-wife of receiving her retirement, savings and other property from her 23 year marriage and also allowed her to be alienated from her Children knowing the ex-wife and loving Mother helped her Children thrive in many ways and has had a clean record her entire life?
The following is not legal advice, just my understanding as a reasonable person.
Do you think if Judge Claudia Silbar was blind like Justice Richard Bernstein; when her law clerk read to her the stipulated judgment both of them would have realized it was an INVALID stipulated judgment?
Therefore, they would have realized Judge Claudia Silbar could not legally sign and file it because the VALUES and PERCENTAGE OF OWNERSHIP were missing from assets whose NAMES as they appeared on the stipulated judgment did not clearly identify them either; thereby preventing the assets from being affirmatively identified by a person of reasonable intelligence?
Would they have realized “NAMCO; Moote Pointe Partners, LLC; Moote Pointe X, LLC; the health and long care insurance; the insurance trusts; the Metlife annuity which was cashed in in 2008” were invalid descriptions and the law firms who drafted, reviewed and signed the stipulated judgment and the ex-husband who is a certified public account and chief financial officer who received his MBA from Harvard were all “TAKING UNFAIR ADVANTAGE” of the ex-wife and loving Mother, SARA HASSMAN who was in therapy, on medication and trying to cope with the sudden loss of her relationships with her Children and other issues of emotional abuse which are well documented?
Can you clearly, without any doubt, identify what property these descriptions are referring to; whose insurance, what trusts, what annuity, their values, the percentage of ownership so you can give an informed consent regarding their division and distribution? Of course “a person of reasonable intelligence” cannot as so much of the material information is missing.
To make matters worse:
No family home was listed; no retirement or savings were listed; many 401k and profit sharing plans were undisclosed and concealed.
Did Judge Claudia Silbar REASONABLY think a Certified Public Account, Chief Financial Officer who received his MBA from Harvard and showed about $2.5 million dollars of income ONLY on the joint tax returns from the last 6 years of the marriage which includes the years of the recession and where the ex-wife could afford to stay home as the full time caregiver nurturing the Children for the majority of the marriage (18 years); that there were no retirement plans, not any insurance or other assets; NOT EVEN A FAMILY HOME?
Furthermore, as this stipulated judgment states the ex-husband was awarded “the Pennsylvania tax delinquency in the amount of $1,240 and will be credited that amount in the property division.”
Do you think if Judge Claudia Silbar was blind like Justice Richard Bernstein she would have asked her clerk WHAT PROPERTY this Pennsylvania tax delinquency relates to and whether that property was included in the stipulated judgment?
Do you think if Judge Claudia Silbar was blind like Justice Richard Bernstein she would have realized that the Private Investigator who testified on April 2, 2014 about concealed companies he found in Pennsylvania, Delaware and California listing the ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN as a Corporate Officer related to this Pennsylvania tax delinquency on the stipulated judgment?
Do you think JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR would have questioned why the Family Law Firms who represented the parties for the divorce process had not disclosed these Companies and had not included them on any Declarations or on the stipulated judgment, especially the Company in Pennsylvania relating to this Pennsylvania tax delinquency?
Do you think Judge Claudia Silbar would have also questioned why the ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN filed a complaint against the Private Investigator for his HONEST TESTIMONY about these concealed companies he discovered in Pennsylvania, Delaware and California which caused the Private Investigator to go to Sacramento, California to defend his livelihood and license against MARK F. HASSMAN’s false allegations which were dismissed?
Do you think if Judge Claudia Silbar was blind like Justice Richard Bernstein she would have questioned the Bonus Compensation Agreement in the stipulated judgment due to its UNSPECIFIED TERMS?
This BONUS COMPENSATION AGREEMENT states: “Wife shall receive 21.5% of all bonuses or other compensation in excess of Husband’s base salary of $20,000 per month.”
A person of reasonable intelligence cannot understand the terms of this agreement since many of the material facts are missing and the terms stated are unspecified and undefined.
Do you think if Judge Claudia Silbar was blind like Justice Richard Bernstein she would have ordered that BEFORE she signed and filed the stipulated judgment which includes this Agreement, that these terms be clearly defined so a reasonable person can give an INFORMED CONSENT?
Do you think if Judge Claudia Silbar was blind like Justice Richard Bernstein she would have questioned why the Family Law Firms did not order the invalid stipulated judgment be set aside or amended when they reviewed it during their representation of the parties when the ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN requested SEVERAL TIMES a reduction in his obligation to pay his ex-wife the agreed upon spousal support?
Do you think if Judge Claudia Silbar was blind like Justice Richard Bernstein she would have granted MARK F. HASSMAN’s post judgment spousal support modification requests SEVERAL TIMES, due to his alleged deteriorating financial condition when being represented by an expensive Newport Beach Family Law Firm and has monthly expensive of over $12,000 which include many items which reasonable people would consider luxuries?
Do you think if Judge Claudia Silbar was blind like Justice Richard Bernstein she would have told the Family Law Firm representing the ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN for his post judgment spousal support modification requests that UNTIL the stipulated judgment is amended so it conforms with the objective Family, Community Property, Contract, Constitutional and other laws regarding a divorce and the division and distribution of property she will not CONSIDER any of his post judgment spousal support modification requests and furthermore, she ORDERS the stipulated judgment to be set aside and amended?
Do you think if Judge Claudia Silbar was blind like Justice Richard Bernstein she would have and still continue to deprive the Children and their Loving Mother of their companionship, even though the Children thrived when their Loving Mother was part of their life and their Loving Mother is known for her good character and values and has had a clean record her entire life of over 50 years?
Do you think Judge Claudia Silbar would rescind the restraining orders the ex-husband and his new wife were GRANTED ROUTINELY UPON REQUEST against the loving Mother, not having a rational basis for their issuance; knowing they have prevented her from attending the graduations and other celebrations of the Children she raised and nurtured and had beautiful relationships with until they suddenly ended around the time of the divorce?
Do you think if Judge Claudia Silbar was blind like Justice Richard Bernstein, she will rectify at the hearing on Wednesday, December 31st; this invalid stipulated judgment and the post judgment spousal support modifications she granted so that the divorce between the parties can finally be completed? Then they can be legally divorced as they hired the Family Law Firms to procure a legal divorce for them, not an incomplete one and hired the Family Law Firms to provide lawful representation for the post judgment spousal support modification hearings; also knowing Judge Claudia Silbar has a responsibility to enforce justice in her courtroom, for all, ALL THE TIME, not just when she feels like it.
-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder; www.PAlienation.org