Do you think JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR is an honest and caring judge or do you think she is Corrupt?

Do you think JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR a family law judge in Orange County believes enforcing UNLAWFUL AGREEMENTS is her privilege and her right because: 
1) as the internet alone shows JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR has had many complaints and negative comments made against her;

2) JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR has repeatedly refused to rectify the fraudulent and unlawful divorce judgment she reviewed, signed and filed on May 7, 2010 (case ‪#‎09D002792‬) where the financial statements and other mandatory information was excluded including but not limited to the value (net worth) of the community estate and where it was disposed;

3) JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR has repeatedly refused to rectify the fraudulent alimony changes based upon the invalid, incomplete and fraudulent judgment while ALSO refusing to enforce that current financial information accurately and completely be disclosed like all income and expense information along with all assets. (case #09D002792);

4) JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR has repeatedly refused to help resolve the form of abuse and torture called parental alienation even though the loving Mother has been LAW-ABIDING HER ENTIRE LIFE OF OVER 50 YEARS and her Children THRIVED in many ways when she was part of their life as their full time Caregiver. (case #09D002792).

Instead JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR made the parental alienation situation WORSE by intentionally issuing a restraining order against the loving law-abiding Mother without any rational basis or sound reasoning so that the loving law-abiding Mother cannot attend her Children’s graduations, birthday celebrations, sports games and any other events if the ex-husband WHO CONTROLLED THE MARITAL FINANCES is present. 
Very harsh to issue the restraining order since the Children thrived when their loving law-abiding Mother was part of their life as their full time Caregiver since the day they were born, don’t you believe?

***Can you think how the Children felt since their loving law-abiding Mother has missed all of their college graduations and other milestone celebrations and holiday events since the time of the divorce which was 7 years ago?

Do you think issuing the restraining order and refusing to rescind it against the loving law-abiding Mother shows JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR is reasonable and compassionate and trying to do what is in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the Children?

So, do you think this is what JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR believes:

1. The loving law-abiding Wife and Mother should just ACCEPT the fact that the value (net worth) of her community estate from her marriage of over twenty (20) years was never established during the divorce proceedings and thereafter because SHE HAS NO LEGAL RIGHT to know the value of the community estate from her marriage of over 20 years. Only her ex-husband has a legal right to know this information.

2. The loving law-abiding Wife and Mother should just ACCEPT the fact that the disposal of community assets from her marriage of over twenty (20) years was never accurately and completely disclosed during the divorce proceeding and thereafter because SHE HAS NO LEGAL RIGHT to know this information. Only her ex-husband has a legal right to know this information.

3. The loving law-abiding Wife and Mother should just IGNORE that California and compatible and consistent Federal laws, codes and cases require that in order for a marriage contract to be lawfully dissolved and a divorce to be valid, lawful and completed and for alimony changes to be valid and lawful; financial statements and other documents must be provided DURING the divorce and EACH TIME an alimony change is requested.

4. The loving law-abiding Wife and Mother should just IGNORE that California and compatible and consistent Federal laws, codes and cases require that in order for a divorce to be valid and lawfully completed, and for alimony changes to be valid and lawful; the net value of the net worth of the community estate must be divided and distributed 50/50 between the spouses at the time of the divorce or there must be a legal agreement to distribute the community property 50/50 between the spouses at a later time where there is informed consent by both spouses.

5. The loving law-abiding Wife and Mother HAS NO LEGAL RIGHT to receive her 50 percent community property interest in the community estate at the time of divorce or thereafter.

6. The loving law-abiding Wife and Mother should just IGNORE that California and compatible and consistent Federal laws, codes and cases require that in order for a marriage contract to be lawfully dissolved and a divorce to be valid, lawful and completed; the entire community estate must be disposed of and said disposal must be clearly and accurately disclosed because SHE HAS NO LEGAL RIGHTS.

7. The loving law-abiding Wife and Mother should just IGNORE that California and compatible and consistent Federal laws, codes and cases require that in order for alimony changes to be valid and lawful, they must be based upon a lawful stipulated judgment and current financial statements and financial information because SHE HAS NO LEGAL RIGHT to receive a lawful alimony award.

8. It is NOT in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the children of all ages from a marriage if they have a relationship with their loving, law-abiding Mother who helped them thrive in many ways and instead only continue their relationship with their father, defendant after the divorce.

9. The loving law-abiding Wife and Mother HAS NO LEGAL RIGHT to continue her positive and enriching companionship she enjoyed with her children since the day they were born and should ACCEPT the fact that at the time of divorce and thereafter, the positive and enriching companionship she and her children shared will be destroyed.

10. It is JUSTICE to deprive a wife of receiving her 50 percent interest in the net value of the net worth of the community estate at the time of divorce and thereafter.

11. It is JUSTICE to deprive a wife of knowing the complete and accurate disposal of the community estate at the time of divorce and thereafter.

12. It is JUSTICE to deprive a law-abiding Wife and Mother of her companionship with her children which abruptly ended without any rational basis or sound reasoning at the time of divorce.

13. It is NOT reasonable to expect the loving law-abiding Wife and Mother and her Children to be intentionally inflicted with severe emotional distress due to the intentional sudden destruction of their companionship which was suddenly destroyed at the time of the divorce without any rational basis or sound reasoning.

14. It is NOT reasonable to expect the loving law-abiding Wife and Mother to be intentionally inflicted with severe emotional distress due to the value (net worth) of the community estate not being established during the divorce whereby she was deprived of receiving her 50 percent interest from her marriage of over 20 years.

15. The loving law-abiding Wife and Mother should just EXPECT that only her husband who controlled the marital finances will be THE ONLY PARENT to be able to afford to provide for the financial needs of their children and for himself.

16. JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR should NOT be responsible for the harms and damages she knowingly, deliberately, voluntarily, intentionally, outrageously and maliciously inflicted and continues to inflict upon the loving law-abiding Wife and Mother because SHE HAS NO LEGAL RIGHTS so JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR in her courtroom has a right to TAKE THEM ALL AWAY.

So what do you think?

Do you think these are the beliefs of JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR?

If not, then why won’t JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR reasonably try to resolve an unlawful, incomplete and fraudulent divorce and help reunite a loving law-abiding Mother with her children who suddenly alienated her at the time of divorce without any rational basis or sound reasoning ?

***Aren’t leaders in our society like judges supposed to help Mothers and Children and make our world a BETTER PLACE FOR ALL OR are they supposed to help the wealthy husband/father PROFIT FROM DIVORCE at the EXPENSE of the loving law-abiding Wife and Mother and their Children?

Bestselling author Stephen Fried explains in his book “The New Rabbi” how religious organizations and religious leaders have been helping wealthy husbands/fathers at the EXPENSE of the loving law-abiding Wife and Mother and their Children.[http://www.palienation.org/the-new-rabbi-by-s-friedchpt-2-…/] 
Do you think JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR is working with religious organizations so all of them can PROFIT FROM DIVORCE at the expense of the loving law-abiding Mother and her Children?

Isn’t an IMMEDIATE CHANGE of a very destructive policy and practice is what a caring, compassionate person WITH A SOUND MIND would diligently enforce so these very severe harms suffered by thousands of Children of all ages and their loving law-abiding Mother will end and others in our society will NOT be harmed by their behaviors, policy and practice?

Do you think JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR is more concerned with PROFITING FROM DIVORCE at the EXPENSE of a loving law-abiding Mother and her Children of all ages than enforcing legal divorce agreements? As always, her actions will continue to show us.
***Is it reasonable for a COMPASSIONATE, CARING PERSON WITH A SOUND MIND to ignore the epidemic problem of parental alienation especially when they are a Judge and her responsibility is to HELP SOCIETY and make it a BETTER PLACE FOR ALL?

***Is a loving, law-abiding Mother and her Children NOT considered part of society in the eyes of JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR?

Does a loving, law-abiding Mother and her Children NOT HAVE LEGAL RIGHTS?

As always none of this information is legal or any other advice, just based on my knowledge and experience.

As I continue to bring forth more and more of the truth to help ENFORCE the rights of loving law-abiding Mothers and their Children of all ages so we can end the conspiracy of a judge, law firms religious organizations, executives, therapists, joint venture partners, relatives and others PROFITING FROM DIVORCE at the EXPENSE of Mothers and their Children.
If not I then who?

I stand for EQUAL RIGHTS FOR ALL. As my wise, compassionate and wonderful Grandfather Ben taught me; if you give up your moral and honest values and character, you have NOTHING. 
I will never give them up even if I die fighting. This is a very worthy and important cause. It is fighting for FREEDOM and EQUAL RIGHTS.
-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder;www.PAlienation.org

Comments

 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.