Do you think the Law allows an ex-husband to make agreements with lawyers, a judge, an accounting firm, executives, religious organizations, a California boarding high school and others to help him conceal MILLIONS of dollars of community assets?

Do you think the Law allows an ex-husband to make agreements with lawyers, a judge, an accounting firm, executives, religious organizations, a California boarding high school and others to help him conceal MILLIONS of dollars worth of community assets from a 23 year marriage that should have been distributed to his ex-wife?

Do you think the Law will punish this ex-husband, MARK F. HASSMAN and those he made agreements with MORE because they took and continue to TAKE ADVANTAGE of the ex-wife and the three Children who they all KNEW OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN at the time of the divorce and since then have ALL been suffering from emotional abuse due to the parental alienation this ex-husband, MARK F. HASSMAN and THOSE HELPING HIM have caused and refuse to end?

Their acts of emotional abuse are well documented showing they have DESTROYED and CONTINUE to destroy the wonderful Mother/Children relationships AND refuse with REASONABLE DILIGENCE to help the Loving Mother with a clean record her entire life of over 50 years who is known for her good character, reunite with her Children.

RABBI DAVID WOLPE and other JEWISH leaders even refused and still refuse to make a telephone call or use their resources and other skills to help the loving Mother and her Children reunite. They also refuse to get RABBI DAVID WOLPE the help he needs so he will stop HACKING THE COMPUTER of the ex-wife which they also have been notified about many times but refuse to even acknowledge.
Religious? Abuse?

Think JEWISH leaders and organizations received money or other benefits from MARK F. HASSMAN and his new wife MIKEL SANDERS-PERKSY to do this?
Bestselling author Stephen Fried explains how the JEWS have been destroying the special Mother/Children relationships of CHILDREN OF ALL AGES for decades in chapter 2 of his book “The New Rabbi.”

Think all these people helping MARK F. HASSMAN, the ex-husband who is a Certified Public Accountant, Chief Financial Officer who spearheaded the Jiffy Lube initial public offering and received his MBA from Harvard, want to keep the Loving Mother and her Children in a state of emotional abuse so she is less likely to be able to reclaim the millions of dollars of concealed assets and income MARK F. HASSMAN and all those helping him TOOK FROM HER and CONTINUE TO DEPRIVE HER FROM RECEIVING?

The Law office of DALE KIKEN helped MARK F. HASSMAN the ex-husband reclassify and remove trust assets without the ex-wife’s consent and has refused to explain why and help rectify what he did and help the ex-wife receive her interest. Think the law allows this or DALE KIKEN could face losing his licenses and being sanctioned?

MARK F. HASSMAN and his new wife MIKEL SANDERS-PERSKY even lied to DR. PHIL because they told him they would encourage and were in favor of reunification but the facts show they have discouraged it?

This is typical because their joint tax returns show they took over $100,000 of delayed tax refunds and several hundred thousand dollars of other delayed tax benefits that the IRS TOLD THE EX-WIFE her 50% interest should have been distributed to her.
Liars and Cheaters lie and cheat.
IRS will understand even more when they see the court transcript and other documents showing that MARK F. HASSMAN swore his new wife MIKEL SANDERS-PERSKY had a Company and was doing very well and all of sudden is now collecting unemployment.

JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR, even stated that because MIKEL SANDERS-PERSKY’s Company has been doing so well for so long, this is how MR. HASSMAN has been surviving in his state of “INSOLVENCY” and thinks he is credible and eliminated the ex-wife’s spousal support entirely because she thinks he does not have any sources of income to pay it when she knew or should have known she refused to evaluate all the sources of income and other factors that the law demands.

Reasonable? Corruption?

This is not legal advice, just my understanding that a Judge cannot grant a spousal support modification because she thinks the ex-husband is credible WITHOUT evaluating all the factors the law requires.
As the transcript shows, this is what she did as NOELLE McCABE of the law firm SEASTROM & SEASTROM representing the ex-husband and KALEEN GONZALEZ of the law firm THE OFFICES OF HARRIS GONZALEZ representing the ex-wife all agreed and have not tried to amend the order or the invalid stipulated judgment which they knew or should have known about because it is my understanding it must be reviewed before a spousal support modification is made.
If they did their job and reviewed it; they would have realized with reasonable diligence that it is invalid and incomplete and they, the ex-husband, Judge Claudia Silbar, ALAN SHIFMAN of the LAW OFFICES OF ALAN SHIFMAN and other lawyers from SEASTROM & SEASTROM even PHIL SEASTROM and many others appear to have violated the law in some way with regards to the divorce process.
CONSPIRACY?  BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY?

Where are these concealed assets and income WORTH MILLIONS that were never distributed to the ex-wife but appear on many joint tax returns during the 23 year marriage which many are part of the court file or can be obtained with reasonable discovery.

GRAND THEFT?

The ex-wife was the full time Caregiver and during their marriage trusted her ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN to honestly handle their finances since he is a Certified Public Accountant and Chief Financial Officer who received his MBA from Harvard.

This is not legal advice, just my understanding:
The law clearly states that spouses MUST show each other mutual respect and not take advantage of each other; which is reasonable.

The facts get worse because do you think the law allows an ex-husband to make an agreement with lawyers, a judge, an accounting firm, executives, religious organizations, a California boarding high school and others so at the end of some Statute of Limitations period this ex-husband will give them some of the millions of dollars of concealed assets and income that should have been distributed to the ex-wife but; he and all of them TOOK ADVANTAGE OF HER in her state of emotional abuse due to the parental alienation this ex-husband caused? I guess they thought she would never survive and figure out the truth.

This is not legal advice, just my understanding: The law involves the INTENT of people. All of these lawyers, a judge, an accounting firm, executives, religious leaders, school administrators and others have been made aware and know or should know that there are millions of dollars of concealed assets and income that they could be in receipt of and/or helped conceal them.

Some also have legal obligations to amend the documents they signed and filed and rectify other unlawful things they did.

Some of them were paid after the ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN swore he was “insolvent” and had the ex-wife’s spousal support totally eliminated.
They were notified about this too.
So, do you think this shows they have an INTENT TOO, to deprive this ex-wife of receiving the concealed assets and income that should have been distributed to her at the time of the divorce? Do you think showing that they INTENDED to deprive the ex-wife of her property she should have received at the time of divorce could cause them to face more sanctions and maybe incarceration?

***When the DOMESTIC VIOLENCE and INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE of this ex-wife and her Children is shown, especially of the MINOR Son WITH HIS HEART CONDITION; do you think all these people could be held accountable for this too since they knew or should have known the ex-wife is a Loving Mother and the Children thrived in many ways when she was part of their life?

They have all intentionally refused to use reasonable diligence to help the ex-wife and her Children reunite and prevent the parental alienation, domestic violence and involuntary servitude from continuing. So do you think they could all be held accountable for the PARENTAL ALIENATION, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE and INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE too; especially since they have not tried to end it and many have even made it worse?

Do you really think it is reasonable to believe that MARK F. HASSMAN is “insolvent” and should have requested to eliminate his ex-wife’s spousal support since he stated in his comment that was published in the Harvard Business School Alumni magazine in December 2009;

“…The recession leaves little room to make excuses about lack of time to work out. I’ve got a sprint event on Catalina Island soon….”

Also as it appears from RECENT documents; MARK F. HASSMAN, the ex-husband bought himself a new Lexus and one for his new wife too; MIKEL SANDERS-PERSKY.

Think this shows he is insolvent? He is a Certified Public Accountant so do you think he will lose that license too since he obviously does not know what the word “insolvent” means?

DO YOU THINK HE THINKS THIS IS FUNNY AND DOES NOT REALIZE THE HARMS HE HAS CAUSED?

WHAT ABOUT ALL THE OTHERS? DO THEY THINK THIS IS FUNNY TOO?

***Do you think a Judge or Jury will look kindly on those who have REPEATEDLY shown they INTENDED and STILL INTEND to take advantage of a Loving Mother and her Children?

The truth always prevails.

I am the ex-wife and the Loving Mother who will bring justice to myself, my Children and millions like us who have been intentionally harmed by corrupt lawyers, judges, rabbis, pastors, priests, accountants, executives, a new spouse and other horrible and sick people who think it is fun or acceptable to destroy the Mother/Daughter and Mother/Son relationships and take our money we saved and investments were earned during our long marriages.
We created a warm, positive home and helped our Children and our ex-husband thrive which is well documented while we put our own careers on hold.

Then they leave us financially and emotionally devastated and think we should just go away while they DISREGARD their legal and moral responsibilities?

It is my understanding this is not what the law provides for and not what the law INTENDS.

Truth will prevail and I represent truth.

If you have any doubt I represent truth, read the court file and start with the stipulated judgment and see all those who signed it and advised me to sign it in my state of emotional abuse knowing I was relying on them to follow the law as I had a legal right to do as I understand and is reasonable.
-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder;www.PAlienation.org

Comments

 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.