Examples of some of the questions I am presenting to the United States Supreme Court in my Second Writ of Certiorari which illustrates the complex legal and moral issues, legal precedent and unreasonable interpretations I am challenging.

This document will be filed soon and I am thrilled with all the progress our REVOLUTION is making to end Parental Alienation and the crimes commonly associated with this terror. We are changing how many do business.

1) Is denying a law-abiding Woman and Mother of Custody and Visitation with her minor Son at the time of divorce and thereafter contrary to the legal precedent the U.S. Supreme Court established in West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1937) because the court found:
“There is no absolute freedom to do as one wills or to contract as one chooses” because restrains must be reasonable for the protection of the community against evils menacing the health, safety, morals and welfare of the people. ?

2) Is California community property law reasonable?

3) By recognizing the Civil, Constitutional and Fundamental Rights of a law-abiding Woman and Mother at the time of divorce and thereafter; will the courts once again be forced to alter the common law distribution of entitlements and redistribution of wealth in opposition to the intentional, malicious illegal design of “freedom of contract” pursuant to the legal precedent set in West Coast Hotel, Nebbia, Steward, and Helvering cases and instead reinstate the legal precedent set by the landmark cases of Lochner and Coppage which promoted capitalism, private property rights, man and woman having equal rights and constitutional freedom which all were deemed reasonable?

As we begin 2018, for all of us living in the World of Love, know that we are prevailing in many important ways and that my defendants and those aiding and abetting them are very delusional and are destroying themselves more and more each day. They think they are above the law and won’t be held accountable. Oh well, my parents, sister and their attorney thought that too in 1985 when they were held accountable and my case helped change the kiddie trust tax laws so children could no longer be abused with a fraudulent grantor trust.

So keep spreading the truth about Parental Alienation as we live with reason and with love in our hearts as we make our world a better place for others living in the world of Love.

As always, none of this is legal or any other advice; it is based upon my knowledge and experience.
-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder;www.PAlienation.org
Parental Alienation is a form of abuse that destroys the sacred bond between a loving parent and their child at the time of a divorce. (Child includes teen and young adult children).

Parental Alienation is a form of abuse that destroys the sacred bond between a loving parent and their child at the time of a divorce. (Child includes teen and young adult children).
PALIENATION.ORG
 

Comments

 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.