Get ready for a mini-soap opera with documents proving the greed, arrogance and abuse of power of all the Evil Predators involved in my lawsuits. They could have been reasonable and compassionate but instead they opened up a can of worms proving their Criminal Conspiracy and Racketeering Enterprise regarding acts of Parental Alienation and all the crimes which commonly accompany this terror.

They can’t deny what they signed under penalty of perjury and stated under oath. As expected, the truth is coming back to haunt all of them; like it did in the classic movie Cape Fear however; I AM PEACEFUL  and using peaceful and legal means to obtain Equal Rights and Justice for all which includes Woman, Mothers and our Children.

The panel of Justices of the CA Court of Appeal will be very pleased with all of my documents proving that the temporary, permanent, stay-away and domestic violence orders had no legal or rational basis to be issued in the first place and then criminally renewed by JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR.
These documents show a clear PATTERN of criminal behavior and motive and intent even though this panel said they are not interested in motive and intent or even character. Maybe this panel of Justices will have to remand the case to the trial court which has jurisdiction to be interested in motive, intent and character. We shall see. 
That hearing is not until May 23, 2018. These documents prove the brainwashing and emotional torture of Parental Alienation which will be clearly exposed. This exposure should set a precedent and standards for other courts to follow in Parental Alienation situations.

In the meantime, I have a hearing next Wednesday, May 9, 2018 regarding the baseless and unlawful vexatious litigant designation crooked JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR granted against me at the request of my (still) legal but evil turned criminal husband MARK HASSMAN. Think this shows a conspiracy again; he requested the temporary, permanent, stay-away and domestic violence orders which had no legal or rational basis but JUDGE SILBAR granted them anyway. Now she granted his baseless and criminal request to declare me a vexatious litigant for exercising my First Amendment rights. 
These baseless and illegal requests and orders are all in compliance with the “formulated litigation strategy” attorney and law firm founder PHILIP G. SEASTROM admitted to in his personal declaration signed under penalty of perjury.

Unfortunately, I also have a very incriminating declaration from my eldest son who is now an adult and is hiding my property and other assets.

Do all these people and others in this Criminal Conspiracy and Racketeering Enterprise really believe they are above the law? It appears that they are so delusional that they do. Like I have said, just give Evil Predators enough time and rope and watch them hang themselves and each other.

Maybe this mini-soap opera will win an academy award as I continue to expose the facts so that I can obtain a legal and valid divorce judgment which includes Ending the criminal acts of Parental Alienation for myself and millions suffering like me and also for future generations.

Here is a preview of some of the “he-said, she-said” facts stated under oath that I will be posting:

My idiot, criminal (still) legal husband MARK HASSMAN stated under oath: “The stipulated judgment goes through the assets completely.” 
In complete contradiction; the judgment lists “NAMCO” and a “profit sharing plan” without listing more of a description, their value and other material factors. 
He graduated from Harvard business school and is a Certified Public Accountant so maybe he will have to lose these licenses since he obviously does not understand the basic laws of “sufficient particularity” and “informed consent” required for a valid contract which includes a stipulated judgment. This is just the tip of the iceberg.

I love this quote he made under oath too: “There was actually only one asset that remained at the time of divorce to be split between the parties.” Is this because he criminally converted all the others without my knowledge and consent? Millions of dollars of assets just seemed to have disappeared under his control. Think he may go to jail for grand theft and other crimes?

Here’s another classic one this idiot (still) legal husband of mine stated: “Respondent (meaning me) wants to enforce her legal rights to Due Process of Law…in truthfulness, she has already been provided that courtesy by the Court & has become a serial abuser of the legal process” 
First, my dear (still) legal husband MARK HASSMAN, Due Process is not a “courtesy” it is a legal right and if I have been provided this, please tell me the Net Worth of the Community Estate under your control; how and when we agreed upon this value; how and when we also agreed upon its division and how it was distributed. This is all part of being provided Due Process but these facts remain a secret as our ENTIRE legal divorce file proves.
Also, an Anti-SLAPP allegation cannot prevent them from being disclosed and will likely result in a lawsuit for fraud, malicious prosecution and obstruction of justice against your law firm SEASTROM, SEASTROM & TUTTLE and also PHILIP G. SEASTROM, personally; based upon his SEVERAL personal declarations and statements which are part of the record.

This next quote makes me sick which my idiot (still) legal husband made: “Custody was never brought up by Respondent or her attorney as a desired item.” 
Really dear, do you think a jury will believe that I, a loving, law-abiding Mother who was the stay-at-home Mother for our children would not want custody? Plus, why would a loving, law-abiding Father want to even think of depriving the Mother of custody? Why would my attorney and anyone expect me to give up my Constitutional right to custody and also want me to? This is outrageous and not reasonable or compassionate.

Here are some of my favorite quotes from JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR:
“I specifically deny that I am biased or prejudiced for or against any party in this action. I further deny that I am unable to act fairly and impartially in this proceeding.”
However, in complete contradiction, here is a quote from my attorney ALAN SHIFMAN referring to JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR and Tom is from the law firm SEASTROM, SEASTROM & TUTTLE.
“You had absolutely no bargaining power in the settlement negotiations. The judge didn’t like you. I got you more spousal support than the judge was going to give you, she acknowledged that in the presence of Tom.”

Another quote from crooked JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR:
“I specifically deny that I have acted improperly in this action.”
Really, do you think a jury will agree?

Here is an all-time favorite quote of mine crooked PHILIP G. SEASTROM stated on his personal declaration under penalty of perjury:
“Seastrom formulated litigation strategy, engaged in decision-making, prepared and filed numerous pleadings, drafted various forms of correspondence, and attended multiple hearings strictly on behalf of Mr. Hassman. During the dissolution process, Seastrom, on behalf of Mr. Hassman, filed such things as requests to reduce spousal support and restraining orders against Ms. Hassman, all of which were granted.”
Does this prove Collusion, Criminal Conspiracy, Racketeering, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, Terror, Torture, Oppression, Malicious Prosecution and Abuse of Process; you bet as I am continuing to prove with hard, solid, credible evidence…their own testimony and statements.

Well, there is so much more as this horrible but important story unfolds regarding PARENTAL ALIENATION and the CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY and RACKETEERING ENTERPRISE which continues to promote it; instead of reasonably and compassionately joining OUR REVOLUTION to end it.

I am thrilled with all of our progress as more and more of the truth is being exposed which will bring about very important changes whether these evil predators like it or not.
As always, none of this is legal or any other advice; it is based upon my knowledge and experience.
-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder;
Parental Alienation is a form of abuse that destroys the sacred bond between a loving parent and their child at the time of a divorce. (Child includes teen and young adult children).

Image may contain: 1 person, text
No automatic alt text available.



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.