I wanted to mention that at the June 11, 2018 hearing, experienced JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR incorrectly stated, as the record will reflect; that I have a legal divorce judgment even though the Net Worth of the community estate, under the control of Harvard educated Chief Financial Officer husband/father MARK HASSMAN, was Never Established, Never Divided 50/50 and Never Distributed in clear violation of California Family Code sections 2102-2120 and many other California and Federal laws. Her rational….

As the court transcript reflects; JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR stated that my divorce judgment was a “stipulated” judgment to which I then responded that there was never any “informed consent.” I want to explain this in more detail.

Pursuant to many laws and also common sense; a judge is legally only allowed to sign and file VALID judgments, stipulated or otherwise, which comply with our laws. If they do not comply, the judge is LEGALLY OBLIGATED to return the “stipulated” judgment to the parties or their attorneys stating what specifically does not comply with the laws and order that the judgment be revised so it does.

A judge is not a robot on some assembly line which just signs and files a judgment without being RESPONSIBLE for verifying that it is valid because it conforms with our laws.

Why would taxpayers pay money to have judges sign and file judgments without being held responsible for reviewing the CONTEXT of judgments before signing and filing them?

Next, I want to explain that the law firm I hired to represent me during the divorce process named THE LAW OFFICES OF ALAN SHIFMAN and its attorney ALAN SHIFMAN, who is an attorney and also a certified public accountant, had the FIDUCIARY DUTY to treat me honestly and fairly and not to self-deal regarding issues of my divorce.

Why would ALAN SHIFMAN advise me to sign a divorce judgment where I was illegally and criminally denied: 1) custody and visitation and; 2) the receipt of my 50 percent interest in the community estate including my retirement and savings?
Also, why would I reasonably AGREE to sign such a judgment? 
So I can become emotionally and financially devastated?

Thus, this along with other facts prove that I COULD NOT HAVE HAD INFORMED CONSENT when I signed the divorce judgment as my legal counsel ALAN SHIFMAN advised me to sign.
Also neither could any of the other parties who signed it because legally required material factors were omitted.
If there is not informed consent, the legal judgment or document is invalid. This is basic CONTRACT LAW.

However, if JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR BELIEVES the divorce judgment is valid then she must enforce ALL the clauses, not just some; unless financial information has been provided which proves the spousal support, for example, must be legally modified. 
Such financial information has never been provided even though my attorney KALEEN GONZALEZ of the Law Offices of HARRIS GONZALEZ allowed JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR to reduce my spousal support to zero, yes zero, on April 2, 2014.

To make matters worse for this CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY and RACKETEERING ENTERPRISE; attorney KALEEN GONZALEZ knew or should have known the divorce judgment JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR reviewed, signed and filed on May 7, 2010, along with my law firm the Law Offices of ALAN SHIFMAN and MARK HASSMAN’S law firm SEASTROM & SEASTROM, was invalid to begin with.

Specifically, attorney KALEEN GONZALEZ knew or should have known the net worth of the community estate, its division and its distribution were never established and ALSO that listed assets lacked the SPECIFIC LEGAL PARTICULARITY required so that a person of reasonable intelligence could identify them; their value and the percentage owned. This was lacking.
Thus, KALEEN GONZALEZ knew or should have known that this divorce judgment needed to be revised so that it complies with our laws and is VALID.

Accordingly, KALEEN GONZALEZ also breached her FIDUCIARY DUTY she owned me as her client, to treat me honestly and fairly and not to self-deal.

I just wanted to make these points clear since all judgments, stipulated or otherwise, must have inform consent and comply with our laws in order to be valid and enforceable.

Accordingly, a fight, battle or war usually begins in a state of EQUILIBRIUM between both sides. 
However, it then becomes clear that the balance has been TILTED SO FAR that the issues being fought for or against can no longer be REASONABLY in doubt. Thus, IT CAN NO LONGER BE REASONABLY IN DOUBT that my divorce judgment is INVALID due to the fact that ALL the parties who signed it could not have had “informed consent” since required legal factors were missing
Also, there are other material reasons including but not limited to a lack of the legally required “specific particularity” and a lack of Due Process as to why I was denied Custody and Visitation.

The existence of the CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY and RACKETEERING ENTERPRISE and all those involved also can no longer be REASONABLY in doubt.

Thus, I am thrilled with the exposure of all this evidence as OUR REVOLUTION is thriving to End Parental Alienation along with Modern Slavery, Fraudulent Divorce Judgments, Criminally Granted Restraining Orders and other crimes commonly associated with this terror.

I am quite confidence OUR REVOLUTION will continue to thrive because as history has proven Truth, Love, Equal Rights and Justice will always prevail.
Also here is a song which also proves why OUR REVOLUTION will continue to prevail as we continue to spread the Truth so others do not fall prey.

As always, none of this is legal or any other advice; it is based upon my knowledge and experience. 
-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder;www.PAlienation.org
Parental Alienation is a form of abuse that destroys the sacred bond between a loving parent and their child at the time of a divorce. (Child includes teen and adult children).



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.