In response to many comments I received about the recent post of the REFUSAL of my evil, idiot husband MARK HASSMAN for ten (10) years now to give me our children’s current contact information so we can communicate, reunite and end the domestic terrorism of Parental Alienation, due to some ALLEGED PAPERWORK ISSUE; My Supporters very intelligently and reasonably questioned why our TAX DOLLARS are paying incompetent, evil, criminal judges to keep PROMOTING THIS TERROR and WHY NOT ONE HONEST judge; religious leader; religious organization; lawyer; charitable nonprofit; nonprofit school; court-appointed therapist; business executive; and even U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG and FORMER FIRST LADY and HARVARD ATTORNEY MICHELLE OBAMA who both claim to love Women, Mothers and their Children; ALL refuse to intervene by reasonably trying to help me and also help end the EPIDEMIC problem of Parental Alienation?

I have contacted all of those listed above and JUSTICE GINSBURG and Former First Lady and Harvard attorney MICHELLE OBAMA are defendants in my Federal lawsuits number CV17-01081-DOC (JEM) and CV16-4188-DOC (JEM) respectively and the others mentioned are part of my State and also the latter Federal case.

In addition, my evil, idiot husband’s following email shows that he along with all the others listed above have COLLUDED, have a CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY and clearly have a DIFFERENT AGENDA than legally, reasonably and compassionately ending the epidemic problem of domestic terrorism called Parental Alienation. Here is his email:
from: [email protected]
to: [email protected]
date: Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 11:47 PM
Sara,
I acknowledge that YOU WERE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE POSITIVE UPBRINGING OF OUR THREE CHILDREN. And I also recognize that there were many positive years during our marriage.
It is my sincere hope that you would be open to the possibility of moving towards a “successful” divorce. Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Mark [Emphasis added, quotations in original text] [End of his email]
DO YOU REALLY THINK MY THREE CHILDREN DON’T WANT TO REUNITE WITH ME? 
If not, why would they reasonably not want to just based on my evil, idiot (still) husband’s email alone without any other evidence? 
Is it because my husband and I have a fraudulent divorce judgment as he ADMITTED TO in court the other day, December 6, 2017, (see prior post for details) AND all my children HAVE BEEN FORCED TO STEAL MY ASSETS and FORCED NOT TO COMMUNICATE WITH ME? 
Do you think these acts of FORCING MY CHILDREN to STEAL MY ASSETS and TO OBEY their father and the others in this criminal conspiracy BY NOT COMMUNICATING WITH ME is abuse, terror, torture, oppression along with Abuse of Power by those in this Conspiracy? It is according to our Federal and State laws including these very basis ones as any reasonable person knows:

1) “No bond is more precious and none should be more zealously protected by the law as the bond between parent and child.” 
[Carson v. Elrod, 411 F Supp 645, 649; DC E.D. VA (1976)]

2) The parent-child relationship is a constitutionally protected LIBERTY INTEREST protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and other laws, codes and cases. [1st, 5th, 9th, 13th and 14th Amendments of the United States Constitution; Civil Rights Acts of 1866,1964; Kelson v. Springfield; 767 F 2d 651; US Ct App 9th Cir, (1985); In re: J.S. and C., 324 A 2d 90; 129 NJ Super, at 489(1974); Bell v. City of Milwaukee, 746 f 2d 1205, 1242^Q45; US Ct App 7th Cir WI, (1985); www.PAlienation.org.]

3) A parent’s right to care for and have a companionship with his or her children are so fundamental, as to be GUARANTEED PROTECTION under the First, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution;

4) Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1964 mandate that men and women are equal and ALL U.S. citizens are EQUALLY PROTECTED by the law, which INCLUDES a LAW-ABIDING WIFE AND MOTHER seeking dissolution of her marriage contract who was the stay-at-home Mother for the majority of the marriage of over twenty (20) years.

The hearing the other day on December 6, 2017 was before the crooked judge named Judge Claudia Silbar, who has repeatedly refused to recuse herself even though: 1) She reviewed, signed and then filed the invalid divorce judgment and; 2) She is also a defendant and potential witness in my State and Federal lawsuits. 
This judge’s refusal to recuse herself is illegal, immoral and unethical especially since my (still) husband NOW ADMITTED at the hearing, OUR DIVORCE JUDGMENT IS INVALID, which this judge signed.

The purpose of this hearing on December 6, 2017 is my evil, idiot (still) husband MARK HASSMAN is trying to prove that Judge Silbar should have me declared a felon and I should go to jail for 5 days or more because my husband ALLEGES, (there has been no due process on the allegation), I intentionally and illegally did not file some form. 
In other words, my evil, idiot (still) husband MARK HASSMAN is requesting that even though the DIVORCE JUDGMENT which he now agrees is INVALID which this Judge reviewed, signed and filed and shows she ALLOWED ME to be:

1) DEPRIVED OF CUSTODY AND VISITATION WITHOUT any tests and other credible professional evidence proving that I am unfit and a danger to my children;
2) HAVE my assets worth many millions of dollars STOLEN FROM ME; 
NOW MY IDIOT EVIL HUSBAND WANTS THIS JUDGE to have me declared a felon and go to jail for ALLEGEDLY not filing a form.

****HAS MY HUSBAND PAID OFF THIS JUDGE SO HE CONTROLS HER? It sure appears that way because… 
MY evil, idiot HUSBAND thinks he can get THIS JUDGE to declare me a felon and sent to jail while ALLOWING him and the others who aided and abetted him in allowing these serious crimes to be committed against me AS THE DIVORCE JUDGMENT PROVES;to be set free…THEY SHOULD NOT BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE but I should go to jail for allegedly not filing some form!!!

As any reasonable person knows, this is clearly an OUTRAGEOUS DOUBLE STANDARD showing a clear ABUSE OF POWER. 
To allow this is against our State and Federal laws AND Public Policy since a law-abiding Woman and Mother has a legal right to EQUAL RIGHTS pursuant our laws in the United States which is a democratic republic. The facts are very clear.

Now, continuing with the questions I have presented to the United States Supreme Court in my Petition for Writ of Certiorari. I am going to start from question One (1) again since what I listed in my prior post was from one of my drafts and not the final petition and also did not include the footnotes.
If you want to see the highlights of these “questions presented” go to my website and view this post http://www.palienation.org/what-a-fabulous-day-for-all-of-…/
You can also find this post on my website currently as the first article under “recent posts” on the left side entitled what this facebook post is entitled. As I add more posts you can still find this post with the “questions presented;” it just won’t be the first one listed.
Here are the questions I presented to the US. Supreme Court:
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW
1) Whether a law-abiding Woman/Mother can legally be deprived of her Civil, Constitutional and Fundamental Rights provided by the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1964 and the Fifth, Fourteenth and Thirteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution by being denied Custody, Visitation and an Ongoing Companionship with her minor son:
a) without any tests performed and; 
b) without any evidence proving she is unfit and a danger to her children; 
c) while public records were ignored including but not limited to her clean record from the Department of Justice at Appendix A1 proving she has been a law-abiding citizen her entire life and;       d) the 2nd draft of a shared parenting agreement in Appendix K proving Plaintiff and her husband intended to have shared parenting ?2

2) Whether a law-abiding Woman/Mother and her husband who were both represented by legal counsel are legally divorced when the divorce judgment in Appendix C (in pertinent part) facially proves Plaintiff has been denied her Civil, Constitutional and Fundamental Rights to Due Process of Law and Freedom to receive the fruits of her labor from her marriage of over twenty (20) years as the Wife and stay-at-home Mother because there were never ANY disclosures made of the legally required: a) Net Worth of the Community Estate worth many millions of dollars and under said husband’s control; b) Its Agreed Upon Division and; c) Its Agreed Upon Distribution; ALL these legally required disclosures, required to be made completely and accurately, remain a mystery in violation of the United States Constitution and many consistent and compatible State laws ?3

3) Whether a law-abiding Woman/Mother and her husband who were both represented by legal counsel are legally divorced when the divorce judgment in Appendix C (in pertinent part) facially proves there was No Informed Consent because the assets listed lack the required sufficient particularity wherefore a person with reasonable intelligence cannot ascertain the assets’: identity; value; percentage of ownership; and other relevant factors. Thus, there could not have been a meeting of the minds of any of the parties who signed said judgment.4

Footnotes:
1- Said record is from Clerk’s Transcript from California Court of Appeal, 2nd Appellate District, Division 8, case number B267984; volume 4 of 4, page 000744 
2- Id. as to Clerk’s Transcript except said agreement is in volume 4 of 6, pages 000796 through798. 
3- The entire United States Constitution which includes the Bill of Rights, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment which is extended to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, the California Family Code (Cal Fam Code)§§ 2102-2120; §721; §2581;§1100; §1101; §4320; §4360. 
4- http://legal-dictionary. thefreedictionary. com/Informed+Consent; Cal Fam Code§§2102-2120.

I am thrilled so much of the truth is being exposed and I hope my courtroom experiences continue to help millions of you. Keep your very intelligent and reasonable questions coming.
As always, none of this is legal or any other advice; it is based upon my knowledge and experience.
-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder;www.PAlienation.org
Parental Alienation is a form of abuse that destroys the sacred bond between a loving parent and their child at the time of a divorce. (Child includes teen and young adult children)

Parental Alienation is a form of abuse that destroys the sacred bond between a loving parent and their child at the time of a divorce. (Child includes teen and young adult children).
PALIENATION.ORG

Comments

 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.