MORE PROOF that there are Business Policies and Agreements to PROFIT FROM DIVORCE, USING PARENTAL ALIENATION to make the loving, law-abiding Mother(father) and the children so distressed and tortured that they can’t figure out the lies and corruption and are intentionally taken advantage of……

Attached are 4 significant pages from my fraudulent and invalid stipulated judgment which clearly shows the fraud and that it is invalid; therefore, I am still married because my marriage contact has not been dissolved legally and many have stolen my community property including SINAI TEMPLE which is where I have been picketing with great public outcry and a lot of support for standing up for the rights of women and children.

Anyway, notice on the 1st attached page, this judgment of dissolution was entered by the court on 5/7/2010 even though it is clearly fraudulent as I will explain below.

Notice on the 2nd attached page under numbers 7 and 8. Number 7 is not a valid clause because informed consent cannot be given because the value of some “401(k) plan” was not disclosed. Wife would not give up $500,000 in a 401(k) plan for just $3,200 nor should the law firm representing her advise her to do this. Further, it is unethical for her ex-husband and the the law firm representing him to even make this suggestion. 
*** As many business people know, the description of what is being agreed to must be very clear and list material information, like the its value and also its name; which 401(k) plan of the Husband?

Law Firms know assets must be clearly described which includes their value and so does the ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN because he is a certified public accountant, received his MBA from Harvard and has been a Chief Financial Officer and negotiated many agreements for over 20 years. CLEARLY they all knew this clause under number 7 was fraudulent and invalid and lacked the ability for both the wife and husband to give their informed consent.

Number 8 is fraudulent and invalid for the same reasons; the assets are not sufficiently described and they are also missing their value.
Number 10 the same, also this clause lacks the material information as to value the annuity was cashed in for AND WHERE the cash was disposed. The ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN controlled the community estate so did he just take it for himself? Is this one of the “purposefully concealed” assets? (see post with letter from Seastrom & Seastrom a few days ago).

The 3rd attached page is very interesting. Notice how in number I, Seastrom & Seastrom representing ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN, served both the Preliminary and also the FINAL declaration of disclosures BEFORE the wife even filed her preliminary one. 
Each spouse must file a preliminary one, discuss it and establish the net worth of the community estate and then file their final one. A final one was never filed on the wife’s behalf. 
Thus, the net worth of the community estate was never established and all those involved just took all of the wife’s 50% interest in the community estate which is believed to be over fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000).
But, it get worse… this agreement was filed by the law firms as shown on the bottom as “expedited processing.” Why? The husband never filed his current income and expense declarations and as explained, wife filed her preliminary declaration of disclosure over 7 months after the husband had already filed his FINAL one, indicting that the divorce was already finalized which is not correct just based on the stipulated judgment and its lack of required documents.

The 4th page shows the signatures of the law firms, ex-husband and Judge Claudia Silbar who knew this was a fraudulent and invalid judgment.

I am so glad to be bringing out more of this truth so we can end the corruption of PROFITING FROM DIVORCE at the EXPENSE OF WOMEN and CHILDREN. The United States stands for JUSTICE FOR ALL!!! I am proud to be enforcing my rights so I can set a precedent for millions. This is justice, this is also Judaism which is helping others morally and honestly, not taking advantage of them.

As I pave the way to make a better Society for all so all will have equal rights.

As Always, none of this is legal advice, just based on my knowledge and experiences.
-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder;

Parental Alienation Solutions's photo.
Parental Alienation Solutions's photo.
Parental Alienation Solutions's photo.
Parental Alienation Solutions's photo.



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.