Public Officials and Others Respond with Indifference and Lies to Parental Alienation and a Fraudulent Divorce where the husband/father stole millions of dollars of the wife/mother’s property
The Los Angeles Times today reported that law enforcement officials and others RESPOND with INDIFFERENCE and LIES when people in Mexico vanish.
SIMILARLY, my civil law suit in Los Angeles County Superior Court (case#BC580980) shows many RESPOND with INDIFFERENCE and LIES HERE in the UNITED STATES:
• regarding Parental Alienation,
• when the divorce judgment and other documents show the husband/father who controlled the marital finances STOLE millions of dollars of the wife/mother’s property instead of dividing the community estate 50/50 as the law requires,
• and when the wife/mother’s support is fraudulently calculated several times and even reduced to zero based upon lies.
Specifically as just these few examples show:
1- On Friday June 20, 2014, I sent COUNCILMAN HARRY SIDHU OF ANAHEIM an email asking him why he has refused to respond to my requests to send me information regarding “substantial consulting fees in 2008.”
The law firm I hired to represent me for my divorce, (The Law Offices of ALAN SHIFMAN) referred to these substantial consulting fees in their letter dated July, 24, 2009 which they sent to the law firm SEASTROM & SEASTROM which was representing my ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN.
Also my ex-husband is a CPA and a graduate of the Harvard Business School and controlled the marital finances due to his education and experiences and he also refuses to provide the information regarding COUNCILMAN HARRY SIDHU’S “substantial consulting fees.”
I asked Harry, whom I know personally as our families would get together regularly, who these fees were paid to and from what entities or from whom. I explained that I need this information to legally finalize my divorce but; he refused and still refuses to provide this information.
COUNCILMAN HARRY SIDHU of ANAHEIM is a public official and should be concerned about following the law so that my ex-husband and I can obtain a LEGAL, NOT A FRAUDULENT DIVORCE and I can continue my beautiful and enriching companionship with my Children.
Further, Harry knows I am a wonderful Mother and a law-abiding citizen but has refused to help me resolve the parental alienation which SUDDENLY BEGAN around the time of the divorce.
2- MARJI KNITTER, President of PAUL A. MOOTE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. dba THE MOOTE GROUP, now MOOTE COMPANIES LLC, is also the Administrator of the FEDERAL defined contribution Paul A. Moote and Associates 401k profit sharing plan.
As the Administrator of this FEDERAL 401k profit sharing plan she has Federal rules and guidelines to follow but has refused to explain to me why she refuses to disclose the information about this plan since it was acquired during the marriage, tax returns and other documents show the community estate made contributions and received distributions AND it was omitted from the divorce judgment. I even explained that I need this financial information to legally finalize my divorce but; she refused and still refuses to provide this information.
3- SINAI TEMPLE in Los Angeles, SADDLEBACK VALLEY COMMUNITY CHURCH and CATE SCHOOL are all not-for-profit organizations which receive government benefits. They also refuse to disclose the information showing the contributions and/or donations made by my ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN, or someone one his behalf.
Further, CATE SCHOOL refuses to provide the information as to the entities or individuals who paid the tuitions and other expenses.
I also explained that I need this financial information to legally finalize my divorce but; they refused and still refuse to provide this information.
4- JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR is employed by the State of California. She has repeatedly refused to rectify my fraudulent divorce judgment; spousal support awards; and also rescind the restraining orders granted without any legal basis or sound reasoning but keep me alienated from my children.
When I have filed requests for her to rectify these fraudulent acts as the law requires of a Judge to follow the law and not to have their own “public monopoly” in their courtroom; JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR has accused me of being a vexatious litigant and close to losing my rope.
5- ALAN D. LIBERMAN PhD, the court-appointed therapist, appointed by Judge Claudia Silbar, has never been concerned with resolving the parental alienation which suddenly began at the time of the divorce, even though I am a fit, law-abiding Mother and my Children thrived in many ways when I was part of their life.
So, as you can see, in this country law enforcement officials and others RESPOND with INDIFFERENCE and LIES to very serious issues which are inflicting serious harms to millions in our society.
This is why I continue to forge forward exposing this truth so we can end the fraudulent, unconscionable and unlawful practices of officials and others.
If not I, then who?
As always, none of this is legal or any other advice, just based upon my knowledge and experiences.
-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder;www.PAlienation.org