The HARVEY WEINSTEIN SCANDAL, the NFL SCANDAL involving the U.S. Flag and OTHER ACTS WHICH VIOLATE THE U.S. CONSTITUTION should make my defendants in my State and Federal lawsuits and those aiding them VERY NERVOUS for many reasons.
First, as the Wall Street Journal reported today 10-12-2017 on page A17:
President Trump tweeted: “If UC Berkeley does not allow free speech AND practices violence on innocent people with a different point of view-No Federal Funds.”
The First Amendment not only allows Free Speech it also allows a person which includes me, the legal right to peaceably PETITION THE GOVERNMENT for a redress of grievances.
I have been doing this by filing State and Federal lawsuits so that I can reasonably resolve my fraudulent divorce judgment which includes acts of Parental Alienation.
My defendants don’t want me to be able to “peaceably petition the Government” so I can reclaim my assets worth millions of dollars which they stole from me at the time of divorce AND they don’t want me to exercise my Constitutional rights to have custody, visitation and an ongoing companionship with my Children either.
They want to keep discriminating against me; a loving, law-abiding Woman and Mother.
HOWEVER, since many of my defendants are NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS and receive federal funding; if they continue to ENABLE my rights to be violated and don’t try to acknowledge and reasonably help rectify their illegal acts and harms they have and continue to cause me; THEY TOO WILL FIND THAT THEIR FEDERAL FUNDING WILL END.
Not only is this REASONABLE, this is also JUSTICE because non-profit organizations which do not support our American values and laws and discriminate should not receive any Federal Funding. If they hate American values and refuse to promote Truth, Liberty, Equal Rights and Justice for All then they should not receive Federal Funding.
Second, Title IX is a federal law which states:
“No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”
Accordingly, SINAI TEMPLE in Los Angeles, which banned me from coming to religious services and all other events including other educational programs, has violated Title IX.
I am an honest, loving, law-abiding Woman and Mother peaceably defending my legal rights including my right to end Parental Alienation which my defendant Sinai Temple refuses to acknowledge. Instead, this non-profit Jewish organization banned me from their premises to try to defame my beautiful character, harass and distress me, EVEN THOUGH SINAI TEMPLE RECEIVES FEDERAL FUNDS for educational and other purposes and Jewish teachings unequivocally promote honesty, family, love and equal rights.
LIKE HARVEY WEINSTEIN AND HIS COMPANY,
SINAI TEMPLE also cannot violate the rights of a vulnerable Woman and Mother at the time of divorce and thereafter by refusing to allow her to participate in their educational programs and activities without reasonably expecting to be held liable.
The same is true for my defendant CATE SCHOOL which banned me from coming to visit my minor Son who they forced to live outside on a bare mattress without any covers and near wires and a sewage pump and other hazards.
My idiot and evil husband and his idiot evil mistress permitted this and my idiot evil husband paid over $50,000 a year for three years for this abuse. I could not end it because I was illegally and immorally deprived of custody.
Further, many of my other defendants will also LOSE THEIR FEDERAL FUNDING because they have subjected me to DISCRIMINATION under their education programs or activities because they keep discriminating against me, a loving, law-abiding Woman and Mother by promoting my divorce judgment and refusing to help me obtain my legal rights. They want to keep discriminating against me which is ILLEGAL and AGAINST PUBLIC POLICY.
Third, a valid contact is one which has a legal purpose. If a person or organization makes a contract for an illegal purpose, that contact is invalid, void and unenforceable because it is AGAINST PUBLIC POLICY. In other words, it is against our laws and against the best interest and welfare of society.
Accordingly, my divorce contact is invalid, void and unenforceable because I was deprived of Custody, Visitation and an Ongoing Companionship with my children which is in violation of our laws because it was NEVER PROVEN with any tests that I was a danger or unfit. I am NOT an alcoholic, drug addict or any other kind of addict.
***I am a loving, law-abiding Woman and Mother as public records and many documents prove. Thus, to deprive me of my Constitutional rights to Custody, Visitation and an Ongoing Companionship with my children is ILLEGAL and AGAINST PUBLIC POLICY which makes my divorce judgment void and invalid; even though it was signed by a judge, lawyers and other judges have affirmed its validity when they know that it is CLEARLY an invalid judgment AND ALSO SHOWS DISCRIMINATION.
My divorce judgment is also ILLEGAL and AGAINST PUBLIC POLICY because I was deprived of all my assets, including retirement. To write and enforce a contract which deprives a Woman and Mother of her assets including her retirement is AGAINST PUBLIC POLICY, especially when she is relying on lawyers, judges and her husband to guide her and be honest and moral since they have a legal obligation to do so and also she cannot focus her mind due to their acts of Parental Alienation. To harm her as the divorce judgment shows they did is also DISCRIMINATION.
LIKE HARVEY WEINSTEIN AND HIS COMPANY lawyers, judges and my idiot, evil (still) husband cannot sign a divorce judgment with illegal purposes. THE WEINSTEIN COMPANY cannot turn its head and allow Harvey to carry out acts of sexual harassment and even pay for some of the settlements without being held liable.
Similarly; lawyers, judges and my idiot, evil (still) husband and my other defendants cannot turn their head and carry out acts of Parental Alienation WHILE stealing my assets worth millions of dollars by intentionally and maliciously depriving me of my legal right to Due Process as the divorce judgment proves they did.
It is clearly DISCRIMINATION too against a loving, law-abiding Woman and Mother which is against PUBLIC POLICY.
All this is just the tip of the iceberg and my State and Federal defendants, if they can focus their mind and are not delusional like Harvey Weinstein, should be very nervous.
As always, none of this is legal or any other advice; it is based upon my knowledge and experience.
-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder;www.PAlienation.org
Parental Alienation is a form of abuse that destroys the sacred bond between a loving parent and their child at the time of a divorce. (Child includes teen and young adult children).