Think a Judge, Lawyers, Religious Leaders, Executives and others have shown INTENT to deprive an ex-wife and loving Mother of her Property?

Think this shows intent to deprive a loving Mother and ex-wife of her property? JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR heard the following statement on April 2, 2014 at a public hearing in her courtroom.

***This is not legal advice, just my understanding.

The Law Firm KALEEN GONZALEZ of the LAW OFFICES OF HARRIS GONZALEZ made the following statement while she was guiding and representing the loving Mother and ex-wife SARA HASSMAN for the spousal support modification hearing on April 2, 2014 before JUDGE CLAUDIA SIBLAR.

“We also—also provided evidence that there were entities under the name of MR. HASSMAN that were not disclosed in previous discovery.”

NOELLE McCABE of the expensive Newport Beach law firm SEASTROM & SEASTROM appeared on behalf of “insolvent” ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN as he swore many times on public records that he is “insolvent,” and “struggling” even though tax returns and other documents show the community estate is worth many millions of dollars and he has concealed millions of dollars of assets and income which he has refused to disclose and JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR has REPEATEDLY REFUSED TO ORDER that he:

1) disclose these concealed assets,
2) disclose how he is able to pay his expenses including his new Lexus he bought for himself also the new Lexus for his new wife he is paying for as documents show and he testified to also;
3) disclose how he is paying for his expensive Newport Beach law firm and    4) disclose how he is paying for many more expenses, as the court file shows but,

Judge Claudia Silbar “thinks” MARK F. HASSMAN is credible and is “insolvent” and reduced the ex-wife’s spousal support, SARA HASSMAN to zero without ordering any DISCOVERY to see and not SPECULATE

that MARK F. HASSMAN,
a Certified Public Accountant and Chief Financial Officer who received his MBA from Harvard, spearheaded the JIFFY LUBE International, Inc. initial public offering during the marriage
and made many millions of dollars during the marriage and TOGETHER with his wife of 23 years SARA HASSMAN.

They made many investments TOGETHER but none were awarded to SARA HASSMAN because MARK F. HASSMAN took them all for himself

including approximately $2 million dollars he received in the 2 years prior to the divorce as the spouse who controlled the community estate while SARA HASSMAN was suffering from the emotional abuse he intentionally caused BY DESIGN due to the sudden destruction of the wonderful Mother/Children bond.

At this time, while MARK F. HASSMAN was concealing and taking millions of dollars of assets and income for himself which was accumulated during their 23 year marriage;

SARA HASSMAN was in therapy, on medication and trying to cope with the sudden destruction of the Mother/Daughter and Mother/Son relationship which evidence shows MR. HASSMAN with the help of others he intentionally caused and still causes. This is called Parental Alienation.

To make matters worse, soon after the divorce and during the recession, SARA HASSMAN brought to JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR’s attention and this information is also an exhibit of several documents in the case file which shows the following comment
MARK F. HASSMAN had published in the HARVARD Business School Alumni Magazine:

“…The recession leaves little room to make excuses about lack of time to work out. I’ve got a sprint event on Catalina Island soon….”

JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR and SEASTROM & SEASTROM and ALAN SHIFMAN of THE LAW OFFICE OF ALAN SHIFMAN and KALEEN GONZALEZ of the LAW OFFICES OF HARRIS GONZALEZ all refused to demand an accounting of this $2 million dollars and many concealed assets which they KNEW or SHOULD HAVE KNOWN about even though many of them signed documents that the divorce judgment is valid and complete and/or based post judgment representation like it was.

Also, JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR reduced SARA HASSMAN’s spousal support to the jurisdictional level of zero on April 2, 2014 retroactive to March 1, 2014 because:
1) she “thinks” MARK F. HASSMAN is “credible;”
2) she “thinks” MARK F. HASSMAN is “insolvent” as he swore under oath and on many documents signed “under the penalty of perjury” and
3) she “thinks” MARK F. HASSMAN has “no ability” to pay spousal support anymore; even though as the record reflects she refused to ORDER DISCOVERY and an ACCOUNTING of the concealed assets of the community estate which SARA HASSMAN has brought to her attention many times as the case file reflects along with the comment KALEEN GONZALEZ made that:
“We also—also provided evidence that there were entities under the name of MR. HASSMAN that were not disclosed in previous discovery.”

JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR has also refused to order as SARA HASSMAN has requested though discovery and these law firms have refused to enforce these discovery requests even those representing SARA HASSMAN;
that MARK F. HASSMAN be ordered provide an accounting by providing the documents to show
1) how he is paying his expenses,
2) those who are paying his expenses which “varies” every month as he listed on his many declarations signed “under the penalty of perjury” since October 15, 2012 under item “s” and why.

Are these gifts as MARK F. HASSMAN stated under oath he received a $21,500 gift from his Corporate Executive friend ANAND GALA?

Are these monthly payments made by others who are paying MARK F. HASSMAN’s monthly expenses due to the:

1) 501(c)(3) agreements he made with

RABBI DAVID WOLPE/SINAI TEMPLE in Los Angeles?

2) 501(c)(3) agreements he made with
PASTOR RICK WARREN/SADDLEBACK CHURCH in Southern California
3) other agreements like those he made with:

CATE SCHOOL in Carpenteria, California;

-his mother ELAINE ADLEBERG involving $55,000;

-Business Executives and Corporate Owners
MARJI KNITTER and MJ KNITTER involving approximately $225,000;

-Joint Venture Partners including the managing partner

STEVE MUROW involving a $2.5 million dollar building and many other investments worth millions of dollars that were acquired by MARK F. HASSMAN and SARA HASSMAN together during their 23 year marriage;

NICHOLAS SAMIOS another business partner who appears to have helped conceal several limited liability companies and a $455,500 distribution due to these community investments;

DALE KIKEN of THE LAW OFFICE of DALE KIKEN which as the evidence shows appears to have helped MARK F. HASSMAN reclassify MILLIONS of dollars worth of community assets to his own separate property and then remove them from several Trusts which were part of the community estate.
Think these Trust assets are some of the assets “entrusted” to the religious organizations in the 501(c)(3) agreements and to Cate School and others to intentionally conceal them from SARA HASSMAN?
Think this is legal?
Think this is grand theft?
Think this is moral?
Think this is what the law intends and permits?

JAMES BORNEMAN of Tulsa and Borneman an Accounting Firm in NY who prepared the joint tax returns during their marriage and has along with MARK F. HASSMAN INTENTIONALLY DELAYED many tax refunds, net operating losses, capital gains and other tax benefits which MARK F. HASSMAN and his new wife, MIKEL SANDERS-PERSKY have taken all for themselves as the tax returns show.
To make matters worse for all of them; they all refuse to correct these incorrect and fraudulent tax returns and file amended tax returns to give SARA HASSMAN her interest which is her property which they know or should know they are depriving her of receiving.
Think this is legal?
Think this is grand theft?
Think this is moral?
Think this is what the law intends and permits?

It is my understanding, not legal advice: California Family Code §2102 requires each spouse (which includes MARK F. HASSMAN, who is the spouse who controlled and still controls the community estate); from the date of separation to the date of DISTRIBUTION of the community, to make an accurate and complete DISCLOSURE of all assets and liabilities in which each spouse and the community HAS OR MAY HAVE an interest or obligation and all CURRENT EARNINGS, accumulations, and EXPENSES, including an immediate, full and accurate UPDATE or augmentation to the extent there have been any material changes.

Said duty to disclose will continue AFTER the family law judgment has been entered until the assets are DISTRIBUTED between the parties and includes the duty mandated by California Family Code §721 that “neither party shall take any unfair advantage of the other.”

Also, current earnings do not only include current income but includes passive income and many other sources which IRS and other regulations and laws specifically list.

Think the discovery needs to be conducted which KALEEN GONZALEZ of the LAW OFFICES OF HARRIS GONZALEZ mentioned when she stated under oath on April 2, 2014:

We also—also provided evidence that there were entities under the name of MR. HASSMAN that were not disclosed in previous discovery.”

so that SARA HASSMAN the ex-wife will no longer be DEPRIVED of receiving her property in violation of many laws and also DEPRIVED of receiving her lawful spousal support award based on the net worth of the completely and accurately disclosed community estate which obviously has not occurred since there are concealed community assets and sources of income?

It is my understanding: Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution incorporates the Bill of Rights and holds that these and other rights are enforceable against the state governments. Fourteenth Amendment explicitly applies the Due Process requirement to the states as Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides in pertinent part: [N]or shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.

It is my understanding: California Family Code §2120 states in pertinent part: The State of California has a STRONG POLICY of ensuring the division of community and quasi-community property in the dissolution of a marriage, and of providing fair and sufficient child and spousal support awards. These goals can only be implemented with FULL DISCLOSURE of community and quasi-community, and separate assets, liabilities, income and expenses and decisions freely and knowingly made. [Emphasis Added]

Think JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR, KALEEN GONZALEZ of the LAW OFFICES OF HARRIS GONZALEZ and NOELLE McCABE of SEASTROM & SEASTROM knew or should have known these laws?

What about MARK F. HASSMAN who is a Certified Public Accountant who was being guided and represented by SEASTROM & SEASTROM, including PHIL SEASTROM during the divorce process and also for post judgment spousal support modifications; do you think all of them knew or should have known these laws too?

What about ALAN SHIFMAN of the LAW OFFICE of ALAN SHIFMAN, who is also a Certified Public Accountant who represented the loving Mother and ex-wife, SARA HASSMAN during the divorce process; shouldn’t he have known these laws too, especially being a Certified Public Accountant too?

***EVEN IF YOU ARE NOT a lawyer, judge or a certified public accountant; don’t you think it is REASONABLE and LOGICAL that before all the marital assets acquired during a marriage and are part of the community estate can POSSIBLY be divided equally they all must FIRST be completely and accurately DISCLOSED?
This is COMMON SENSE and this is why it is also my understanding that the law adamantly requires; “neither party shall take any unfair advantage of the other.”

*******So here is the big question:

Why has JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR and all these law firms and MARK F. HASSMAN himself refused to willingly provide the discovery to show the disposition of the “entities under the name of MR. HASSMAN that were not disclosed in previous discovery;” as KALEEN GONZALEZ of the LAW OFFICES OF HARRIS GONZALEZ stated at the public hearing on April 2, 2014 along with other concealed assets and sources of income; including how “insolvent” MARK F. HASSMAN’s expenses are being paid and other questionable agreements and documents?

Do you think all them know about the 501(c)(3) agreements the ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN has with:

RABBI DAVID WOLPE/SINAI TEMPLE in LOS ANGELES and

PASTOR RICK WARREN/SADDLEBACK CHURCH in Southern California

and an agreement MARK F. HASSMAN has with the California Boarding High School CATE SCHOOL and some of these others?

Do you think they know or should know “entities under the name of MR. HASSMAN that were not disclosed in previous discovery” and also other concealed assets have been “entrusted” to these Religious Organizations and Cate School with 501(c)(3) and other agreements?

Do you think the ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN, JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR, these LAW FIRMS and others who have willingly and intentionally helped and continue to help MARK F. HASSMAN conceal MILLIONS of dollars of community assets and income sources and their disposition are violating the law as I understand?
It is also logical that all the assets, income sources and liabilities of the spouses in a divorce are disclosed so they can then be divided equally and fairly?

Do you think Judge Claudia Silbar and all these Lawyers GOT PAID or received other benefits OR WILL WHEN SOME STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS PERIOD ENDS?
Or, do you think they just ENJOY financially and emotionally harming a loving Mother and her Children while risking their careers?

Why hasn’t JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR and why hasn’t the Law Firms including those who signed the divorce judgment tried to AMEND the judgment so it complies with the law by ordering a complete and accurate disclosure of the community estate and an accounting of its disposal, as I understand needs to be done before a divorce is valid and complete?
Why haven’t they tried to order that this discovery be conducted?

***Is this what the law intends; for a loving Mother who nurtured her Children and provided a nice home and promoted her ex-husband’s career while putting her own on hold from many years to be deprived of receiving her property, her lawful spousal support and her companionship with her Children at the time of divorce?

Do they think it is FUN to abuse a loving Mother and her Children and deprive her of receiving her property and income and all of them of their companionship with each other?

Do you think they think the loving Mother will not be able to hold them ACCOUNTABLE just like her parents, sister and their lawyer thought many years ago when they used her social security number and set up a fraudulent grantor trust? She sued all of them and also changed the “kiddie trust” laws and was much less experienced then.

Plus, now SARA HASSMAN, the ex-wife and Loving Mother has an abundance of incriminating evidence against these and other organizations and individuals. Sara Hassman was suffering from seizures, emotional torture and abuse at the time of the divorce when it appears all of them illegally and immorally took advantage of her by depriving her of her legal rights.

Well time will tell if any of them try to reasonably rectify the harms they have caused including trying to REUNITE HER WITH HER CHILDREN since she is known for her good character and has had a clean record her entire life of over 50 years.

***It is my understanding that the law does not intent for the spouse who worked outside the home for most of the marriage to take all the retirement, savings, investments and other assets from the marriage and destroy the loving Mother/Children bond while the loving Mother who nurtured the children and helped advance her ex-husband’s career while putting her own career on hold is left financially and emotionally devastated. Do you think this was intended?

***It is my understanding that the law does not intent for the spouse who was the full time Caregiver for most of the marriage to be left financially and emotionally devastated while the ex-husband with the help of a judge, lawyers, religious leaders, a California boarding high school, an accounting firm, joint venture partners, corporate executives, a new wife and others take HER property, savings, retirement and investments for themselves while LYING TO THE CHILDREN so they think their loving Mother should be alienated or THREATENED them if they refuse to do so. ***

This is not  justice, this is abuse and very evil and it is my understanding the law holds those accountable for knowingly, intelligently, voluntarily, outrageously, intentionally and maliciously committing all kinds of abuse and showing a clear pattern of violating the law.

Time will tell especially if those involved refuse to rectify the harms they have caused in the meantime. The TRUTH always prevails.

-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder; www.PAlienation.org

Comments

 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.