To avoid being Cheated make sure Technical and Financial words are clearly defined; like Insolvency.

There are many definitions for many words like INSOLVENCY so to avoid being cheated or deceived, make sure in an agreement that financial and technical words are defined so they are clearly understood. Also, in court try to get the Judge to define financial and technical words so you know what definition is being used.

For example, my ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN who is a Certified Public Accountant and Chief Financial Officer, who received his MBA from Harvard and spearheaded the Jiffy Lube International, Inc. initial public offering in the 1980’s and since then has negotiated multi-million dollar agreements and hired a Newport Beach Family Law Firm to guide and represent him for the divorce and hearings to reduce my spousal support swore: “I’ve been insolvent for years.”

However, evidence shows he has encumbered himself with many expenses and also has not completely and accurately disclosed all his sources of income and other information NECESSARY to even determine if he is insolvent according to any definition.

For example, a person or a company can be accounting insolvent, cash-flow insolvent but balance-sheet solvent or some other type of solvent. (This is not legal advice, just my understanding.)

I do not think a competent and reasonable Judge like the one I clerked for will think it is funny or JUSTICE that my ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN, with the cooperation of JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR and SEVERAL LAW FIRMS have allowed my ex-husband to conceal the information necessary to determine if he is insolvent by any definition but allowed my spousal support to be eliminated because as my ex-husband swore:
“ I’VE BEEN INSOLVENT FOR YEARS,” “I AM STRUGGLING” AND “MY NEW WIFE IS UNEMPLOYED” but:

1) He recently acquired 2, not just 1 but 2 Lexus Financial loans for a new Lexus for himself and his new wife (even though he has been insolvent for years),
2) AND somehow also got approved for a personal credit card where he can charge at least $37,000 (even though he has been insolvent for years),
3) and there are many more examples too.

Does this sound like someone a competent and reasonable Judge like the one I clerked for or a jury will believe my ex-husband is credible and Judge Claudia Silbar should have reduced my spousal support to zero just because my ex-husband swore he is insolvent and JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR “thinks” he is “credible” even though the information was not disclosed to make it POSSIBLE to determine if my ex-husband is insolvent according to any definition.

Just because an ex-husband does not WANT to pay spousal support does not mean he can violate the law by lying so he gets his spousal support obligation reduced or eliminated.

***Commonly, narcissists and those with control, entitlement and power problems and disorders think THEY can violate the law because the law does not apply to them.

Think my ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN has these control, entitlement and power problems and disorders?

I have been told professionally that he continues to show the characteristics of someone who does but; he refuses to go get help and just continues with this type of behavior. I and others have just learned to expect it.

Unfortunately, many today look at divorce as a BUSINESS DECISION and they intentionally take advantage of the ex-wife who, as many documents show, is known for her beautiful character and values and who nurtured the Children and promoted her ex-husband’s career and provided a warm, loving home while putting her own career on hold.
But, then when she refuses to go along with a student loan scheme or other things; the ex-husband GETS RID OF HER and REPLACES HER WITH ANOTHER MODEL who will do exactly what he wants. Many experts can verify this is what narcissists and those with entitlement, control and power problems and disorders commonly do.

To say you are some type of “insolvent” when you know or should know you ACTUALLY are not insolvent because you can afford many things but are trying to get out of your obligation to pay spousal support because you do not WANT to pay it is immoral and also not what the law provides.

Then you also use this “insolvency” lie to get approved for over $225,000 of student loans so you can run what is believed to be a student loan Ponzi scheme and use the money for your own investments while abusing the Children too.
You force, threaten or bribe the Children to alienate their Loving Mother which clearly shows how sick, immoral and corrupt those are who create Parental Alienation and those who cooperate with them are and why it is so very important to be proactive in bringing out the truth so Parental Alienation can be eliminated.

I thought this information regarding epistemology which is how many words have many definitions and that immoral, deceiving and corrupt people interchange them all the time to intentionally deceive and cheat others, is important to be aware of.

Tomorrow I will give another example of this “insolvency” and how my ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN could be incriminating himself and others in many ways, even a Corporate Executive.

As I keep forging forward bringing out more and more of the lies, schemes and manipulations involved in the emotional abuse of Parental Alienation.
If not I, then who?

When the truth is understood, change follows as history and many authors have shown.

-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder; www.PAlienation.org

Comments

 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.