Tomorrow is my hearing and I can’t lose whether the judge rules in my favor or against me regarding BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION.
Bank of America, N.A. sued me because, I told them that until I legally resolved my fraudulent, unlawful, invalid and unenforceable divorce contract; I could no longer pay my credit card because my husband with the COOPERATION of others fraudulently reduced my alimony to zero. Thus, I reasonably stopped using the credit card.
(Remember, I am still married due to my fraudulent, illegal, invalid and unenforceable divorce contract so this is why I say “husband.”).
I could no longer pay the credit card balance because my sick, greedy, lying, manipulative husband MARK HASSMAN, and also the greedy, lying, manipulative JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR,
THE LAW OFFICE OF HARRIS GONZALEZ,
SEASTROM & SEASTROM law firm,
SADDLEBACK VALLEY COMMUNITY CHURCH,
CATE SCHOOL and others fraudulently, immorally and unlawfully worked TOGETHER to fraudulently help enforce that my husband became “insolvent” and could no longer pay my alimony so it got reduced to zero.
However, the overwhelming facts show my husband MARK HASSMAN got approved for 2 Lexus vehicles and had his old Lexus paid off by a 3rd party directly to BANK OF AMERICA, which as I understand is tax fraud.
Plus, to make matters worse for all of them, there are many other hidden assets, income and payments in my husband’s BANK OF AMERICA accounts that were illegally concealed.
My husband also got approved for a Bank of America credit card with a $35,000 credit limit.
Does this sound like my husband needed to reduce my alimony to ZERO also without disclosing his personal net worth as the law demands?
Any reasonable person knows that you have to back your testimony up with facts; this is the law but my husband did not do this as the court records show and the judge and law firms allowed.
So tomorrow, I have to go before a judge who will decide whether the documents I filed with the court showing what I just explained above and more details, will be accepted by this court in the Bank of America case against me.
I never received my legal interest in the community estate worth millions of dollars (not even my retirement money) because my husband took everything for himself as the divorce contact shows and I filed this document with this court. (I was so sick due to the Parental Alienation and was taken advantage of by those mentioned and many others which I have sued.)
Thus, this judge will either rule:
1) that my financial situation is dire which it is as any reasonable person can understand . Plus, I have qualified for state and federal assistance programs and will therefore accept what is called my fee waiver. Accordingly, I will not have to pay several hundred dollars in filing fees to file my documents which explain this case and show my husband’s Bank of America statements and other relevant documents that were subpoenaed earlier in the divorce process.
2) or that my financial situation is not dire and I have to pay the filing fees.
However, I can’t pay these filing fees as Bank of America knows or should know and also knows my husband is not “insolvent” with the meaning that he can’t pay my alimony.
There has been quite a lot of money flowing through his Bank of America accounts as THEIR OWN records show which I filed with the court. These are the papers the judge will decide tomorrow if they will be accepted since I can’t pay the filing fee.
So does this mean I am deprived of my Constitutional Right to Due Process pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution if I can’t afford to file my documents with the court because BANK OF AMERICA helped conceal money, property and other assets I should have received at the time of divorce and thereafter. This money, property and other assets were illegally concealed from the divorce proceedings and divorce contract as the court records show which I am trying to have the court accept tomorrow.
***So, is this just another TACTIC or SCHEME to deprive me of my Constitutional Right to Due Process if the judge rules that I must pay the fee before filing any documents?
Will this issue against Bank of America have to be resolved in Federal Court? Depriving a person of their right to due process involves the Constitution and is a Federal case.
I will keep you posted as more and more organizations become involved and keep incriminating themselves and others.
***This is all part of exposing the truth and obtaining justice as the wise, honest and compassionate judge I clerked for, the late JUDGE JAMES S. SFEKAS, taught me. I am so grateful I was his clerk.
Tomorrow will be a great day for reasonable, moral, honest, compassionate people who support ending THE NATIONWIDE FRAUDULENT DIVORCE AND PARENTAL ALIENATION CRISES.
Either way, my case will proceed against Bank of America, N.A.; I just don’t know in what court yet or maybe in both.
As always none of this is legal or any other advice; it is based upon my knowledge and experiences.
-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder;www.PAlienation.org