WHAT REALLY WENT ON AT THIS IN-CAMERA MEETING, and list of Concealed Assets.

Before I discuss the list of concealed assets which is extensive, I want address the in-camera meeting Judge Claudia Silbar had with only my ex-husband and our two boys which I am told is a violation of Proposition 59 of the California Constitution.
(This is not legal advice. This is to bring attention to some issues that need to be addressed so my divorce will be legally completed and not invalid and fraudulent as it now is. I hope Judge Claudia Silbar will address them at the hearing coming up because they are relevant to spousal support.).

It appears that the purpose this in-camera meeting where she did not even determine WHY the boys “had no interest” in reuniting with their loving MOTHER was to INTIMIDATE the boys so they would not even think about reuniting with their loving Mother and not even think about discussing any concealed assets or any agreements.
Again, this meeting shows corruption at its best and a grave abuse of authority to say the least.

As many have found as the videos and other information on my website and elsewhere show; many have had very unfair and harmful decisions granted by Judges that are not in the best interest of the Children or the loving Parent.
It appears, and I know from being a judicial clerk, unfortunately, there are Judges that can be bought and paid to do corrupt things not caring how they harm the Children, the loving Parent and our Society.
Evil beyond words but I am glad this truth is coming out.

From the myriad of facts I have, to my chagrin, it appears Judge Claudia Silbar is one of those Judges. I hope she proves me wrong on this one and shows me she is a capable judge who rectifies her wrongful and unlawful rulings including the invalid and fraudulent stipulated judgment she signed and reviewed and reinstates my spousal support from a 23 year marriage where millions of dollars of community assets have been concealed.

Now, the list of concealed assets that were omitted from the stipulated judgment and others that were undistributed because they were “netted out” that I am aware of so far and were discussed at the hearing before Judge Claudia Silbar on June 11, 2014.

Looking at the stipulated judgment, it is clear on its face that it is invalid and the divorce has not been lawfully completed which is consistent with the letters between the family law firms both myself and my ex-husband hired to represent us during the divorce process where he was copied-in (not me) where they discussed:
UNADJUDICATED ASSETS;
PURPOSEFULLY CONCEALED ASSETS and the
RISK OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES.
These letters were exhibits on my Notice of Motion entitled “Adjudication of Omitted Assets, Reinstatement of Spousal Support, Set Aside Judgment due to Fraud Upon the Court,” and also discussed at the hearing on June 11, 2014 before JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR.

Despite the stipulated judgment showing that it is invalid; it was signed by the law firms that represented me and my ex-husband; the law offices of ALAN SHIFMAN and the Newport Beach law firm SEASTROM & SEASTROM , respectively and furthermore, ALAN SHIFMAN is a CPA and has Investment licenses along with his Law license.
My ex-husband who signed the stipulated judgment and was the spouse who controlled the community estate is also a CPA, Chief Financial Officer and graduate of the Harvard Business School who “Spearheaded” the Jiffy Lube International IPO who was copied-in on the letter about
UNADJUDICATED ASSETS;
PURPOSEFULLY CONCEALED ASSETS and the
RISK OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES.

JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR also signed and REVIEWED the stipulated judgment but also sold her soul and continues to sell her soul every time I enter her courtroom as the transcripts show from her rulings that are contrary to many laws along with her courtroom demeanor.
***Shameful and I know the Judge I clerked for would have her removed from the bench and also reported her to the CRIMINAL DIVISION along with all the lawyers and my ex-husband and have them all heavily sanctioned as the laws require not only to compensate me but also to deter themselves and others to ever think about repeating their heinous acts.

What has been going on in JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR’s courtroom is not Justice, it is called LINING THEIR OWN POCKETS with the retirement, savings and investments of a loving, kind, caring Mother, ME, who diligently raised her children and supported her ex-husband’s career and provided and warm home.

What has been going on in JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR’s courtroom is not Justice, it is called Parental Alienation which is destroying the special Mother/Child bond.  She, my ex-husband and the lawyers obviously do not want my Children and myself to enjoy the beautiful and positive relationships we had until they abruptly ended around the time of divorce.

I guess they and others they have enlisted to help them accomplish their unlawful acts like trust and estate lawyers who removed and reclassified trust assets, religious organizations and schools who have these assets in 501(c)(3) agreements or other similar agreements and many others NEVER thought I would recover from the emotional abuse and THEN figure all this out and PROVE it which I know I will and have already begun.
My parents, sister and their lawyer thought the same thing when I refused to go along with their fraudulent grantor trust scheme and I PROVED them all wrong too and now I am much more experienced and knowledgeable too.
The truth will prevail

*** Around the time of divorce I was RECOVERING from emotional abuse and the SUDDEN loss of relations with my Children and was on medication (which I still need to take) and in therapy and REASONABLY relied on all of them to not take advantage of me as the laws mandates they must not do.

*** It is a very sad state of affairs when you can’t even rely on your own lawyer and the Judge to follow the law and do what is right and also your ex-husband and the lawyers he hired who have many licenses and are risking their career to get MY MILLIONS of dollars at the end of a statue of limitations period as they intentionally and maliciously try to financially and emotionally devastate me and my Children; tearing us apart and also trying to financially devastate us.

Many Rabbis and Jewish Organizations have been doing this financial and emotional devastation for decades.
The Jewish Organizations are known to use 501(c)(3) agreements and make other “charitable” agreements to help fathers intentionally destroy the special relationship between a Mother and her Children as acclaimed author Stephen Fried clearly explains has been going on in the Jewish Community since the 1970’s.

Acclaimed author Stephen Fried specifically mentions the late father of Rabbi David Wolpe of Sinai Temple who was also a Rabbi who intentionally and so very maliciously helped many wealthy fathers destroy the special relationship between the loving Mother and her Children at the time of divorce in exchange for monetary, political and other benefits he and Jewish Organizations received from the wealthy father.

Now here is the list of the Concealed and therefore Undistributed Community Assets I am aware of at this time and many were discussed before Judge Claudia Silbar at the hearing on June 11, 2014 regarding Unadjudicated Asset, Reinstatement of My Spousal Support and Fraud Upon the Court:
1) $1.7 million dollars of distributions that were never accounted for but were received by the community estate the last year of the marriage;
2) NAMCO Partnership, LLC
3) PJ West, LLC
4) PJ West, LLC-Riverside
5) Primary Family Residence or any proceeds from the sale
6) 2 other homes- one in Newport Beach, California and one in Ojai, California
7) The Paul A. Moote and Associates, Inc. 401K Profit Sharing Plan.

Now this is very interesting:

SEASTROM & SEASTROM, the Newport Beach Family Law Firm who represented and guided my ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN through the dissolution of marriage process including DRAFTING AND SIGNING the stipulated judgment that was filed on May 7, 2010 was also hired by my ex-husband to prepare his Income & Expense Declaration dated October 15, 2012 which he signed “under the penalty of perjury” and they also signed. They both knew or should have known the asset “Moote Profit Sharing Plan,” was omitted from the stipulated judgment because MARK F. HASSMAN’s Income & Expense Declaration dated October 15, 2012 they PREPARED AND SIGNED, shows they typed the words “Moote Profit Sharing Plan” and also the words “Loan to pay 2010 taxes” which is “current” and has a balance of “$4,478.”

The Newport Beach Family Law Firm SEASTROM & SEASTROM especially should have known the asset “Moote Profit Sharing Plan,” was omitted from said stipulated judgment because they knew or should have known my ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN worked at this Company during the marriage and that “Moote Profit Sharing Plan,” was acquired during the marriage as documents and other information shows.

For example, MARK F. HASSMAN’s Income & Expense Declaration prepared by said Newport Beach Family Law Firm SEASTROM & SEASTROM on his behalf which he signed “under the penalty of perjury” on March 20, 2014 which was exhibit “P2” at the hearing before Judge Claudia Silbar on April 2, 2014 clearly shows in number 1 that he has been employed by Paul A. Moote & Associated, Inc. (dba The Moote Group) as a CFO since 11/2004.

(FYI, when said Newport Beach Family Law Firm SEASTROM & SEASTROM prepared this document on his behalf they knew MARK F. HASSMAN had sworn he was “insolvent” because, as just one example they prepared his Declaration he signed “under the penalty of perjury” on January 13, 2014 which stated;
‘I have no income. I do not have the ability to pay spousal support.”
Really now?
Think this Newport Beach Law Firm is working for him for free?
Think a jury or a reasonable judge will believe that? ).
Remember, a discharge of indebtedness is deemed Income by the IRS and several laws.
This is not legal advice, I am just trying to understand why Judge Claudia Silbar has ruled to eliminate my spousal support which should be reinstated with interest pursuant to many laws and cases regarding Contract, Property, Family and Marital rights AND why Judge Claudia Silbar has refused to set aside the stipulated judgment and rectify the millions of dollars of concealed and undistributed assets depriving me of my rights.

***Is it because JUDGE CLAUDIA SILBAR has an “agreement” with my ex-husband MARK F. HASSMAN that if she cooperates with him, SHE TOO can receive some of MY concealed assets worth millions including my retirement income, savings and investments like “Moote Profit Sharing Plan,” from my marriage of 23 years where I worked together with my ex-husband promoting his career, raising our Children who thrived and provided a warm family home?

Even if the Newport Beach Family Law Firm SEASTROM & SEASTROM for some reason thought “Moote Profit Sharing Plan,” had a different characterization than being a community asset; they knew or should have known that failure to disclose “Moote Profit Sharing Plan,” is a violation of the law because all assets which the parties HAVE OR MAY HAVE an interest in, regardless of the characterization, must be disclosed as the Property, Contract, Family, Marital and other Laws mandate.

It is unreasonable that SEASTROM & SEASTROM the Newport Beach Family Law Firm who represented and guided my ex-husband through the dissolution of marriage process DRAFTING AND SIGNING the stipulated judgment and then PREPARING AND SIGNING his Income & Expense Declaration dated October 15, 2012 in preparation for his request to reduce his obligation to pay my court ordered spousal support; did not realize “Moote Profit Sharing Plan” was an omitted asset, despite its characterization.

Therefore “Moote Profit Sharing Plan” needs to be adjudicated and they need to amend or set aside the stipulated judgment pursuant to but not limited to California Family, Community Property, Property, Contract and Marital Laws, Codes and Cases, along with the Family Law Firm who represented me; the LAW OFFICES OF ALAN SHIFMAN, where ALAN SHIFMAN is a lawyer and also a CPA.

TO MAKE MATTERS WORSE:
“Moote Profit Sharing Plan” is a Defined Contribution Plan and contributions were made with community property as several documents show including one in my ex-husband’s handwriting. Therefore said the Newport Beach Family Law Firm SEASTROM & SEASTROM and the LAW OFFICES OF ALAN SHIFMAN especially should have known the asset “Moote Profit Sharing Plan,” is an asset which the parties HAVE OR MAY HAVE an interest in, regardless of the characterization, and accordingly must be disclosed pursuant to many Property and Contract Laws, Codes and Cases as well as those regarding the Family and Marital Relations.

“Moote Profit Sharing Plan” appears to be one of the concealed assets that my ex-husband outrageously, knowingly, intelligently, voluntarily, intentionally and maliciously concealed from me and instead in violation of many laws, outrageously, knowingly, intelligently, voluntarily, intentionally and maliciously “entrusted” or “assigned” to RABBI DAVID WOLPE/SINAI TEMPLE of LOS ANGELES; PASTOR RICK WARREN/ SADDLEBACK CHURCH, the CATE SCHOOL a CALIFORNIA COLLEGE PREPARATORY BOARDING HIGH SCHOOL and where others outrageously, knowingly, intelligently, voluntarily, intentionally and maliciously cooperated with him including but not limited to: Family Law Firms, Judge Claudia Silbar, Trusts and Estates Law Firms, an Accounting Firm, Joint Venture Partners who tried to extort $112,500 from me too as many documents show.

Since this post is getting long I will finish the list of concealed assets tomorrow because it is quite lengthy.
-By Sara Hassman, Parental Alienation Solutions, Founder; www.PAlienation.org

Comments

 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.